How to Become the Reviewer of the Journal
How to go a reviewer and exist a adept ane
- Why become a reviewer?
- How to be a reviewer?
- How tin you go a good reviewer?
- Use objective expertise
- Build your timeliness
- Work on constructive commenting
Why become a reviewer?
Peer review is at the heart of loftier-quality publishing. Consider beingness a reviewer a fashion to help advance your field of interest and provide constructive feedback to your fellow authors. Due to the huge increment in manuscripts submitted for publication, reviewers are quickly becoming a valuable professional figures.
If yous are an author who benefited from the peer review process you should consider getting yourself involved and provide valuable comments to fellow authors. Y'all should encounter condign a reviewer equally a professional responsibleness.
How to exist a reviewer?
Make sure your personal contour page (whether institutional, on LinkedIn, on ORCID, on ResearchGate and other similar services) is kept up to appointment with your areas of interest and enquiry, making sure you add relevant keywords, including your contact details.
How you are invited to review depends largely on the periodical, so always look out for guidelines on the journals' website. Some publications require a formal engagement, others welcome an independent approach. In this case, get in touch with the editor (or editors) and permit them know yous are willing to help. If yous are a young researcher, let senior scientists know you are willing to participate in peer reviews, then they tin suggest your proper noun; equally a young trainee, ask your adviser to involve you in peer review nether their supervision.
If you're ever presented with the opportunity to participate in open peer review, or other new peer review workflow models, get for it and explore new formats. Open review is designed to increase transparency in peer review and give ability back to the community by opening up an otherwise closed process.
Peer review is often considered an unpaid academic duty. However, information technology is also a great way to keep upwards-to-appointment with the developments in your field and allows you to be an actor in your community. In whatsoever example, peer reviewing requires expertise and time and, even if you are paid in the typical sense, in that location are means to get visibility and acknowledgement for your piece of work. Explore ways in which y'all can earn credits for your activity as peer reviewer and join all services available today.
How can yous become a good reviewer?
Use objective expertise
When you are invited to review a manuscript, editors count on your knowledge of a specific topic. The start indicate to consider, therefore, is that you can provide valuable feedback with competence to your swain authors. If you are not familiar with the topic discussed, y'all should make a betoken immediately to alert the editor and decline the invitation. Agree to review only if you lot have the required expertise to evaluate the work and tin can be objective and unbiased in your comments.
One time you take accepted the commitment, dedicate time to it and do your best to betoken out flaws in the manuscript, but also highlight adept points. Peer reviewing takes valuable time, so reserve sufficient time to create and shape comments which volition assistance authors to improve their piece of work. Peer reviewers are primarily expected to guess the validity of the study, its technical soundness and that claims presented are supported by valid data. Additionally reviewers are asked to evaluate the results and interpretations reported in the paper. Each journal volition define what is expected from its reviewers, therefore you should always read the guidelines provided and any reviewing instructions received.
Build your timeliness
At that place is a very wide understanding that 1 of the cardinal qualities in peer review is timeliness.
Some authors have been working for months on a peer review ready manuscript and so practise non keep them waiting longer than necessary and remember how you would be eagerly waiting for a review report on your ain work…
Unless you take fourth dimension to commit to the peer review, do not accept the task.
Upon invitation, check your awaiting engagements and reply equally shortly equally possible: this will also articulate your inbox. If you lot cannot arrive, striking the refuse link and consider suggesting an culling colleague for the editor. This volition be greatly appreciated by the editor, and particularly so from younger journals with a smaller peer reviewers panel. If you take on this new engagement, make a annotation in your calendar nigh deadlines. Journals will transport y'all notifications and reminders before your review is due, so try and consider them every bit a tool to proceed you on runway, rather than an annoying clutter of your inbox…
Should anything crop up in your schedule and delay your report, make sure you inquire for a borderline extension. This will too help the editors to keep authors upwards to appointment with the peer review procedure of their work.
Editors and journals will be grateful not just by your proficient comments, merely also for your agreement of their need to go along a steady manuscript flow.
Work on constructive commenting
The main purpose of peer review is to meliorate author's competence and skills. The main purpose of the peer review process is to provide off-white feedback to fellow authors. Go along that at the centre of your review, equally the ultimate goal is to make your research field stronger.
Constructive feedback has been proven to be an effective fashion to improve research, fifty-fifty in instance of negative comments or rejections. Always carry in mind that a journal is soliciting your comments for your expertise.
We like to recommend that reviewers should be polite towards the authors and not make offensive criticism, even in case of really poor piece of work. Their adjacent efforts will greatly do good from your comments., if they are presented in a effective fashion.
A not bad attention will be devoted – on your part – of the manuscript presentation and readability. Notwithstanding, acquit in mind that many authors may write in a 2nd linguistic communication. You should focus on the contents of the manuscript, rather that its grade: information technology is not your task (generally speaking) to copy-edit a manuscript or correct spelling errors, but pointing out a lacking language is important for the authors.
Suggested readings
A step-by-step guide to peer review: a template for patients and novice reviewers. BMC Health and Care Computer science (2021)
How to Write a Peer Review for a Clinical Case. JACC: case reports (2021)
How to exist a good reviewer. The Scholarly kitchen (2019).
What makes a great peer reviewer? Tips from Nature Enquiry editors (2016)
Source: https://www.reviewercredits.com/how-to-become-a-reviewer-and-be-a-good-one/
0 Response to "How to Become the Reviewer of the Journal"
Post a Comment